Use Case: SaaS Company — In-App Help Desk & Support Triage
A B2B SaaS company cut first-response time from 4 hours to 4 minutes using AIWU as their in-app help desk and support triage system — without replacing their support team.
Before You Start
This use case combines several AIWU features. Guides you’ll want to read first:
- Customer Support Chatbot — support-focused chatbot setup
- REST API Quick Start — in-app integration via API
- Lead Qualification Form — capture and qualify support requests
The Challenge
The company had 2,400 paying customers and a 2-person support team. 70% of support tickets were questions already answered in their documentation. The team was bottlenecked answering repetitive questions instead of handling complex issues that actually needed human judgment. Customer satisfaction scores were suffering from slow response times.
The Solution: 4-Layer Support System
Layer 1: In-App AI Chat (Instant Answers)
AIWU chatbot embedded in the SaaS app’s help panel, trained on the entire product documentation, FAQs, and troubleshooting guides.
System prompt:
You are the support assistant for [Product Name].
You have access to our complete documentation.
Your job is to answer user questions accurately based
on the documentation. If you can't find the answer,
say "I don't have information on that — let me connect
you with the support team" and offer the escalation option.
Always be direct and solution-focused. Users are
technical professionals — avoid over-explaining basics.
Don't suggest workarounds that aren't documented.
If the user reports a bug or unexpected behavior,
collect their account ID and describe the issue,
then escalate to the team.
Knowledge base trained on:
- Full product documentation (all 120 help articles) — via Knowledge Base training
- API reference documentation — uploaded as a dataset
- Changelog and known issues list — updated monthly
- Top 80 support ticket resolutions — converted to Q&A training pairs
Result: 65% of incoming chat questions answered without escalation.
Layer 2: Smart Ticket Triage
When a user submits a ticket (via the company’s existing helpdesk tool), a webhook triggers AIWU to classify it before it reaches the support team.
Workflow: New Ticket → Classify + Route
- Trigger: Incoming Webhook from helpdesk (Zendesk/Freshdesk)
- Action: Classify with AI —
Classify this support ticket: "{{webhook.ticket_body}}" Return JSON only: { "category": "billing|technical|feature_request|bug|onboarding", "priority": "low|medium|high|urgent", "suggested_response": "one-sentence suggestion for first response", "auto_resolvable": true/false } - Branch (auto_resolvable: true): Generate full response → send to customer via helpdesk API webhook → close ticket
- Branch (auto_resolvable: false): Send Slack to support team with classification, priority, and suggested response
Support agents receive pre-classified tickets with a suggested first response already drafted. They review, adjust if needed, and send — instead of reading and writing from scratch.
Layer 3: Onboarding Email Sequence
New trial users receive an AI-powered onboarding sequence. Each email is generated fresh based on the user’s profile — not a fixed template.
Workflow: New User → Personalized Welcome
- Trigger: New user registration (WooCommerce Memberships / custom webhook)
- Action: Generate Text — personalized welcome email based on their signup answers (use case, industry)
- Action: Send Email
Users with an “e-commerce” use case get e-commerce examples; users in “education” get different examples. The AI adapts the content to each user’s context.
Layer 4: Developer Support via MCP
The company’s technical support engineer uses Claude Desktop + MCP to investigate customer issues directly in WordPress:
- “Show me the last 10 posts created by [email protected]” — finds content linked to a specific user
- “List all published knowledge base articles that mention ‘authentication'” — searches content to verify documentation coverage
- “Create a knowledge base article about the new webhook retry feature” — drafts and publishes docs from conversation
This reduced time-to-resolution for complex technical issues by ~40% because engineers could investigate and update docs in one session.
Results After 6 Months
| Metric | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| First response time | 4 hours | 4 minutes (automated) / 45 min (escalated) |
| Tickets auto-resolved | 0% | 38% |
| Support team capacity (tickets/day) | 25 | 60 (with same headcount) |
| Trial-to-paid conversion | 18% | 24% (better onboarding) |
| CSAT score | 6.8/10 | 8.4/10 |
Key Principles from This Case Study
- AI doesn’t replace support — it removes the repetitive 70%. Human agents handled more complex work and delivered better results because they weren’t drowning in basic questions.
- Train on real tickets, not just docs. The 80 resolved-ticket Q&A pairs were the highest-value training data. Real user language matches how users actually ask questions.
- Ticket classification pays for itself immediately. Even if the AI doesn’t resolve the ticket, arriving pre-classified and with a drafted response cuts agent handling time in half.
What’s Next
- 🤖 Set up your chatbot: Set Up Your First AI Chatbot
- 🧠 Train on your docs: Embeddings in 10 Minutes
- 🔗 Webhook integration: Webhooks: Connect External Services
- 🖥️ MCP for technical teams: 10 Things Claude + MCP Can Do
Last verified: AIWU v.4.9.2 · Updated: 2026-02-25
